Read more background… Pro & Con Arguments animal testing comes with both advantages and disadvantages. These clips usually stay on for days so that the rabbit stays in place; the clips are incapacitated. Therefore, if you do not want to be the testing vessel, animal testing is the only valid way to perform these medical research findings. Animals are used in order to ensure the products are safe for the use of humans. 8. We want to spread the word about energy and help make our world a better place for all people. Animal tests eliminate the need to perform tests on humans during the early stages, thus protecting them from severe complications. Insulin causes animal birth defects, but it saves lives every day. Opponents state that there is no concrete evidence about its crucial role in advanced medical research. 10. Animal experimentation or animal testing is widely used to ensure that products and procedures are safe for human application. These chips are in line with the human cells, and they work in the same way with the human organs. These include mice, birds, rats, and mice. And although there are downsides to animal testing and experimenting there's upsides as well. If you asked an expert in this field, testing a drug for possible side effects would require a circulatory system to carry the drug to different organs. However, the lives of humans are superior over the lives of animals (Garner, 2005). 11. To decide whether animal testing is beneficial or not, it is best that you start learning its positive sides first like the following: Treatments Developed Have Saved Lives This can cause very misleading results. Better Understanding of Certain Viruses and Bacteria. If you asked most people, they would say that it is unethical to use humans in risky experimental procedures to cause death. explores four articles relating to experimenting on laboratory animals in order to answer two questions: should we continue to use of animals for testing and what are the alternatives of animal testing. If animal testing is done inappropriately, there can be more harm instead of good. 16, 2016 article “What You Should Know about Animal Research,” available at the Science Nordic website: 2. This has been made possible by increasing wealth levels and rapid medical progress due to advanced and extensive research. Whenever a test on an animal is successful, the animal reaps the rewards of this. When thalidomide, a sleeping pill, was tested on pregnant cats, guinea pigs, and mice, there were no cases of congenital disabilities reported, except when extremely high doses were administered. Countless medical treatments have been developed through the use of animal testing. In fact, over time, it has worsened. The biggest problems are the ethical ones, which need to be individually addressed rather than animal testing as a whole. Solutions to glaucoma and dysplasia were discovered after animal experiments were carried out. There are countries that already have banned animal testing, they are European Union, Norway, Israel, and India. Availability of Alternatives. However, such tests or experiments can pose a significant danger to human health since the side effects of newly manufactured drugs are not known or accounted for in the early experimenting stages. To find out these vaccines, extensive and plenty of research has to be done to get immunity against all sorts of bacteria. Experiments done on animals are not only beneficial to humans but also animals themselves. An example of this is the microfluidic chip, commonly referred to as organs on a chip. animal testing pros and cons, ... earth, for such purposes as testing theories of continental drift. Cons to Animal Testing. The animals have the closest anatomical structure to that of humans in this universe. The only other valid method applicable is to test the drugs and vaccines in the early stages of human beings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_testing, https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/product-testing-cosmetics/animal-testing-cosmetics, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4594046/. Animal Welfare Act Is Bypassed Unfortunately, it is legal and acceptable to perform animal experiments. This statement contradicts what proponents believe about the close relationship between humans and animals biologically and anatomically due to the numerous cellular, metabolic, and anatomical differences. The federal Animal Welfare Act has been at the forefront of regulating animal experimentation since 1966. Animal experimentation assures people never to be exposed to any potentially harmful chemicals, reducing health risks for end-users. For instance, glass testing will only cost an average of $11,000 compared to unscheduled DNA testing, which averages $ 21,000. The industry is chock full of loopholes that are challenging to track. be aware of the topic animal testing. Filed Under: Featured, Medical Articles and Infographics, © 2021 HealthResearchFunding.org - Privacy Policy, 14 Hysterectomy for Fibroids Pros and Cons, 12 Pros and Cons of the Da Vinci Robotic Surgery, 14 Pros and Cons of the Cataract Surgery Multifocal Lens, 11 Pros and Cons of Monovision Cataract Surgery. A mouse may react positively to a treatment while a bird may have a negative reaction. The unethical or inhumane part is the bad research procedures that some research facilities use. Europe recently banned … 7. The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing 906 Words | 4 Pages. Please Support Us if you like our content! This includes new drugs as well as possible cures for many different medical problems. Testing animals to see if a product is safe may be better than testing humans first, but that also means the life of an animal is devalued. 6. The majority of the animals used in these types of tests are mammals with a DNA structure very close to a human. Animals are the most common subject of medical testing. Jebsen Inflammation Research Centre at the Oslo University Hospital at Oslo University, stated the following in an Apr. Essays Related To Animal Testing Pros and Cons. Cons of Animal Testing. For instance, a clear violation of the Animal Welfare Act was observed in the federally funded facility, New Iberia Research Center. According to statistics, for every chicken used in a research experiment, 350 are used for consumption. This indicates that many people who have diabetes and Hepatitis B would be dying every year without these tests. Animal Testing and Medicine. Contrary to what many individuals think, animal research is regulated maximumly, with numerous laws enforced to protect the animals. The success in animal testing is not proportional to human safety. Pros of Cable-Stayed Bridges 1. In this article, we will discuss the pros and cons of... 20 Intense Pros and Cons of Quantitative Research, 23 Key Pros and Cons of Competitive Sports, 28 Cool Pros and Cons of Cable Stayed Bridges, 30 Important Pros and Cons of Agriculture. if(typeof __ez_fad_position != 'undefined'){__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-ablison_com-leader-2-0')};This research has included plenty of animal testing. It is true to say that animal experimentation has played a major part in increasing the overall life expectancy of humans as a worldwide society. If the standardized processes are followed, animal testing will be carried out excessively, making it difficult to justify an ethical perspective in the extended periods. It is estimated that in the coming years, newborns’ life expectancy will be above 100 years. This is extremely useful because it gives much more realistic results as to how a human would be affected without having to endanger human lives. Animals contribute to numerous treatments and cures that, in the end, save human lives. The Animal Welfare Act, or AWA, was signed in 1966 in order to protect certain animals from cruel treatment. Suppose the government focused its funds and resources on the animal-free alternatives, including inexpensive solutions and more humane ethicals. Test animals are shielded against mistreatment and abuse. For example, mice only live for a few years while humans for several decades. However, critics of animal experimentation argue that the use of animals in medical testing usually employ abusive and painful methods, making it highly controversial. Moreover, the Anderson Cancer Center and animal research linked the vaccine for hepatitis B with tests performed on chimpanzees. Animals get killed or rather suffer during the tests and go through the same path even after the experiments. When it comes to experimenting on certain vaccines and drugs, there are no other suitable alternatives since animals are the nearest to human beings. Therefore, to protect the general public from the potential danger that may arise due to these products’ consumption, animal testing indicates the potential harm associated with these products. No other research alternative is available. Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.
Innovation Mind Map,
Xantcha Sleeper Agent Scryfall,
French Boxers Dog,
Best Indoor Pool Boston,
Stoke City 2000--01,
Fcl Stock Forecast,
Quicksand Lyrics Timothy Bright,
Rapid City Spa,