Rob Parry, you are talking about war. aids research The most effective way of confirming the safety of cosmetics in organic tissues before being used by human beings is That’s one of the reasons the HSUS would like to see leading companies such as L’Oréal take a public stand for the Humane Cosmetics Act: They’re already using nonanimal methods to remain in the … Rob Parry, please explain how a drug called etanercept (Humira (R) ) was developed. Animal testing helps ensure the safety of drugs and other substances that humans may be exposed to on a daily basis, such as cosmetics. On the clean air issue, please also find the courage and write something about this to the polish government. The Commission argued that it hopes to eventually phase out animal testing completely, but that it is currently a “ complete ban on animal research in the EU would be premature and it would risk chasing out biomedical research from Europe.” There are over 40 countries worldwide so far, which banned or restricted animal testing on cosmetics and cosmetic ingredients but there is still a large part of the world where animal testing of cosmetics remains a practice. How. Animal testing for cosmetic reasons, that is realy bad. Strange the ones who want to stop the animal tests don’t answer this simple question ! What a great idea! Simulating organs using chips could replace some animal testing. Is animal testing really necessary? Research done on animals can save countless human lives. https://levmm1.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/the-pros-and-cons/#comments. In the end, taking the pros and cons into consideration, animal testing highlights the fine line between ethics and practical need, and the ultimate decision is subjective to the values of each individual. Primates represented 0.05% of all animal testing in the EU. India, Israel, Norway, Iceland and Switzerland have passed similar laws. Simple answer in we consider the well-being for every living things on this earth but with a prioritization for humans: when it is possible to do technically without animal, just forbidden hurting and painful experiment on animal. It is already banned for cosmetics. Animal testing for medical reasons a not a realy bad thing, but not a good thing either. If we all become vegetarians, so we will no longer see sheep, herds of beef or pigs in the fields we drive past. Difficult, strict norms though, same as with meat and milk consumption. Rodents (primarily mice and rats) together with rabbits represented 80% of the animals used for testing purposes in the European Union in 2011. ; the immune system is completely dispersed by the organism. No debating society has yet declared a win for the motion. Children are not responsible for idiotism of their parents. Not untill adequate way of other testing is found. Animals. (AP Photo/Steven Senne) LAS VEGAS -- A growing number of U.S. states are considering a ban on the sale or import of cosmetics that have been tested on animals, as advocates argue testing products such as lotions, shampoos and makeup on rabbits, mice and rats is cruel and outdated. No, unless you want diseases to catch up with us, oh yeah blabla in vitro research more bla different metabolism and blabla. Activists argue that technology can already replace animal testing completely, and that using animals is unnecessary and cruel. Says Joe Biden has plans to ban animal agriculture and gas-powered cars. Read the text please. Killing and testing anything on animals is no science. You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them. Your email address will not be published. Sad. Animal testing is expensive, as one must pay for food, housing, and maintenance, as well as the initial cost of breeding/buying the animal. How many do you see as you drive through the rural areas of our countries? Let’s only test on humans! ?Most research is carried out within universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, farms, defense establishments, and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry.? 7 decades ago, those lands were in war. If it is related to life, e.g. Paying through the nose to do so. Reptiles, amphibians, and fish were the next most used group at 12.4%, followed by birds at 5.9%. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the blogs do not necessarily reflect those of Sather Health. Is. It has already led to the discovery of insulin and hepatitis C; vaccines against polio and hepatitis B; and procedures such as open heart surgeries, coronary bypass surgery, and heart transplantation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3QqT9B7lPk. Let us know your thoughts and comments in the form below and we’ll take them to policymakers and experts for their reactions! Our classifications are different but the biological processes, … I worked for a Cosmetic company, and i know for a fact that animal testing is useless, and no one wanted to do it (there are better and cheaper ways). Animal testing may save millions of human lives, but at the expense of the lives of animals. I think Poland should focus on cleaning its disgusting air, and not stopping science. Of course it couldn’t be because what they eat is what you live by. The law will also ban the sale of cosmetics that have been tested on animals for profit. Proponents, on the other hand, point out that animal testing is strictly regulated in the European Union, and is used only for scientific research. Animal testing in the United States is regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), passed in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985. It is cruel and selfish for humans to test on animals and no animal deserves to be locked up all day let alone have chemicals and all sorts of stuff rubbed on their skin, squirted into their eyes or shoved down their throats. The prohibitions are known as ‘the testing bans’. Their children have a right to be cured with all methods. Cells on a chip will be replacing animal testing. There should be no question here. Yes we should! Heart. Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results. Animals and Humans don’t have the same DNA what works for them could be harmful for us! Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email. Poor. Yes – but we need to be clear on this. Every opportunity to embrace these advancements should be used for the betterment of the human population. It is known as the ‘marketing ban’. Without animal testing you would not have ANY of the medicines to treat cancer, infectious diseases or vaccines. Experiments on Animals Should Not be Banned. Most animals are euthanized after being used in an experiment.? Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. No*. Price: Animal testing is expensive, as one must pay for food, housing, and maintenance, as well as the initial cost of breeding/buying the animal. Should Animal Testing Be Banned? Animals. I’ll support Y’re effort with my like. “Right2Water”? (word count includes paper outline) Technology and animal testing have provided the human population with many advancements in the past century.